Ergun argues against sociology that focuses solely on the individual while ignoring broader societal shifts, labeling such approaches as "insufficient psychology" rather than true sociology. Academic Significance

The author proposes "dialectics" as the correct scientific method. He argues that social reality must be evaluated in its "totality" or "wholeness" to be truly scientific.

Ergun evaluates various scientific methods and critiques existing sociological approaches in Turkey. He famously critiques prominent Turkish figures—such as Emre Kongar, Şerif Mardin, and Mübeccel Kıray—for what he views as methodological shortcomings.

is a critical sociological work by Doğan Ergun that examines the methodological crisis in social sciences, particularly within the Turkish context . Originally published in 1993, the book argues that scientific knowledge must be "methodical knowledge" to distinguish itself from other forms of information. Book Overview

The work is considered a staple in Turkish sociology libraries. It serves as a foundational text for understanding the "crisis" of Turkish social sciences and provides a framework for how researchers can develop more authentic, scientifically sound methodologies rather than merely describing objective behaviors. Yöntemi Bulmak - Doğan Ergun - Kitapyurdu.com

The book establishes that finding a method begins with philosophy. It explores the transition from abstract logic to concrete research plans through a defined method.