Windows-10-1909-macos-lite-big-sur-edition-x64-2022
The draft text you're looking for refers to a specific designed to look and feel like macOS Big Sur . These "Lite" or "Edition" builds are typically created by third-party modders (like Ghost Spectre or specialized groups on sites like the Internet Archive ) to provide a lightweight, aesthetically themed version of Windows 10 version 1909.
The ISO and final installation size are significantly smaller than the standard Windows 10 build. windows-10-1909-macos-lite-big-sur-edition-x64-2022
Pre-installed transformation pack including the macOS dock, top menu bar, Finder-style file explorer, and Big Sur icons/wallpapers. The draft text you're looking for refers to
Uses the stable 19H2 kernel, known for its compatibility with older hardware while supporting modern software. Because this is a modified "Lite" version, some
To install, you must create a bootable USB drive using a tool like Rufus or the Media Creation Tool . Because this is a modified "Lite" version, some features like the Windows Store or specialized hardware drivers may need to be reinstalled manually depending on the specific mod version.
Random adjectives, desperate efforts to “humanize” the tech resulted in this huge review to contain next to no information at all.
There is no easy way to say this: software RAID 0 on PCIe is simply retarded.
Thanks for your thoughts
Now just make it affordable
Well, for enterprise it is very affordable for what you get. If you are concerned about consumers/enthusiasts I can see where you are coming from, but this is not meant for them. Next year, however, we may be seeing performance like this trickle down.
More than likely next year
As an enterprise product I can see it as a high-end workstation device but not a server device. The lack of RAIDability seems to limit its use to caching and high-speed scratch work area.
I’ve been informed that PCIe hardware RAID will be available on the Skylake CPU and the Xeon version when it comes out later. Now we’re talking………
so this is a preview, not a review… where are the comparisons to P3700 and PM951?
I don’t have access to those drives. We reviewed the P3700 in another system. Because of that as well as a change in our testing methodology, we cant not graph them side by side. Looking at the P3700’s specific review you can gauge for yourself the approximate performance difference between the two.