After 40 years of history, Urano World has been created with the aim of bringing together, under the same name, different companies belonging to Papiro Company, which have evolved and are part of the same ecosystem. With Urano World, we want to simplify communication with our clients and strengthen the relationship with a single global interlocutor operating in Spain, Latin America and the U.S.
Joaquín Sabaté Pérez (CEO)
: In his Trojan Oration , Dio famously characterized Homer as a deceiver who intentionally misrepresented the events of the Trojan War. By "proving" that the Trojans actually won the war, Dio used the flexible nature of fiction to dismantle Homeric authority and subvert traditional Greek historical narratives.
In Imperial Greek literature, the figure of Homer served as a battleground for defining the boundaries between historical truth and poetic fiction. During the Roman Empire, Greeks grappled with their own cultural identity by re-examining the "father of Hellenism" and the Trojan War, which was viewed as the inauguration of Greek history. This tension was not merely academic; it was central to how Imperial authors validated or questioned the heroic past. Homer as the "Ideal Historian" Homer between History and Fiction in Imperial G...
Some authors of the period, such as in his Geography , staunchly defended Homer's historical and geographical accuracy. Strabo viewed Homer as an expert geographer and a reliable source of information, arguing that the poet’s fictional embellishments were built upon a solid core of factual history. By treating Homer as an "ideal historian," Strabo sought to preserve the authority of the Homeric past as a foundational pillar of Greek knowledge. Homer as the "Divine Liar" : In his Trojan Oration , Dio famously
took this critique to its logical extreme in True Stories . By creating an overtly impossible novella and populating it with Homeric figures, Lucian parodied the historians and poets who claimed to tell the "truth". His work highlights the burgeoning recognition of prose fiction as a distinct genre, one that exists in the "generic space" between myth, poetry, and history. Cultural Significance in the Imperial Period During the Roman Empire, Greeks grappled with their
: In the Heroicus , Philostratus presented a dialogue with the ghost of Protesilaus, which "corrected" the Homeric account. This work positioned itself as "true history" revealed by an eyewitness, effectively using fiction to critique the supposed historical inaccuracies of the poems. The Blurring of Boundaries: Lucian’s Satire
Conversely, other writers used the ambiguity of the Homeric epics to challenge traditional authority.
The debate over Homer’s "truth" was a means for Imperial Greeks to negotiate their status within the Roman world. By analyzing Homeric authority, they explored:
: In his Trojan Oration , Dio famously characterized Homer as a deceiver who intentionally misrepresented the events of the Trojan War. By "proving" that the Trojans actually won the war, Dio used the flexible nature of fiction to dismantle Homeric authority and subvert traditional Greek historical narratives.
In Imperial Greek literature, the figure of Homer served as a battleground for defining the boundaries between historical truth and poetic fiction. During the Roman Empire, Greeks grappled with their own cultural identity by re-examining the "father of Hellenism" and the Trojan War, which was viewed as the inauguration of Greek history. This tension was not merely academic; it was central to how Imperial authors validated or questioned the heroic past. Homer as the "Ideal Historian"
Some authors of the period, such as in his Geography , staunchly defended Homer's historical and geographical accuracy. Strabo viewed Homer as an expert geographer and a reliable source of information, arguing that the poet’s fictional embellishments were built upon a solid core of factual history. By treating Homer as an "ideal historian," Strabo sought to preserve the authority of the Homeric past as a foundational pillar of Greek knowledge. Homer as the "Divine Liar"
took this critique to its logical extreme in True Stories . By creating an overtly impossible novella and populating it with Homeric figures, Lucian parodied the historians and poets who claimed to tell the "truth". His work highlights the burgeoning recognition of prose fiction as a distinct genre, one that exists in the "generic space" between myth, poetry, and history. Cultural Significance in the Imperial Period
: In the Heroicus , Philostratus presented a dialogue with the ghost of Protesilaus, which "corrected" the Homeric account. This work positioned itself as "true history" revealed by an eyewitness, effectively using fiction to critique the supposed historical inaccuracies of the poems. The Blurring of Boundaries: Lucian’s Satire
Conversely, other writers used the ambiguity of the Homeric epics to challenge traditional authority.
The debate over Homer’s "truth" was a means for Imperial Greeks to negotiate their status within the Roman world. By analyzing Homeric authority, they explored:
