Happy Easter (1984) 1080p Apr 2026

The film follows Stéphane Margelle (Belmondo), a wealthy businessman and serial womanizer. After dropping his wife Sophie (Marie Laforêt) off at the airport for the Easter weekend, he immediately picks up a beautiful 18-year-old named Julie ().

(original French title: Joyeuses Pâques ) is a 1984 French comedy film directed by Georges Lautner and based on a play by Jean Poiret . It is a classic "sex farce" starring French cinema legend Jean-Paul Belmondo . Plot Summary Happy Easter (1984) 1080p

When his wife unexpectedly returns home early and catches them together, Stéphane panics and introduces Julie as his long-lost daughter from a previous marriage. To his surprise, his wife plays along, inviting Julie to stay with them, which forces Stéphane into a spiral of increasingly absurd lies and comical situations. The film follows Stéphane Margelle (Belmondo), a wealthy

13 responses to “Virgin Media blocks access to Pirate Bay”

  1. Daniel Baines avatar

    I think its the start… there's worse to come.

  2. Julian Bond avatar

    Interesting. I'm also blocked and I'm using Google's DNS and not Virgin Media's. A simple VPN service can still access Pirate Bay as predicted.

  3. PR Doctor avatar

    Argh, me hearties and shiver me timbers. I hope it doesn't happen in Australia. I'd never be able to "evaluate" anything.

  4. Mark Knight avatar

    Its a terrible move, I'm disguised by the UK corurts and the government/s who helped/allowed this to happen.

    Two useful links.. TPB thoughts
    http://www.pirateparty.org.uk/press/releases/2012/apr/30/pirate-bay-blocking-ordered-uk/

    Their proxy link
    https://tpb.pirateparty.org.uk

  5. Sean Carlos avatar

    Italy routinely blocks gambling sites which are not registered with the state gambling monopoly (http://www.aams.gov.it) … which would appear to violate the spirit of free commerce within the EU.

  6. Dan Thornton avatar

    I’m another person who thinks it’s a terrible decision by the court. It won’t make a dent in piracy, but just makes it easier for more censorship of websites in the future than private companies such as music rights holders disagree with for any reason.

    Sites in the U.S have already been mistakenly taken offline and then brought back a year later, for example. If that’s someone’s sole earnings, then they’re utterly stuck for 12 months without cash, and presumably might not even know until one day their traffic drops off a cliff.

    The only good thing is that at least I can avoid using ISPs that have complied with these court orders for the time being, along with using a VPS etc, and that it may encourage more people in the future to check out the Pirate Party, Open Rights Group, etc etc.